Page 1 of 1

Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2020 6:49 am
by thonginguk
Hi

I wasn't sure what topic to put this under, but....

I've been reading the site and I am interested in the difference in terminology around men's underwear and also the difference in attitudes. I am in the UK, by the way. Europe seems to broadly share terminology but in the US you use different terms and have different social norms.

Here in the UK if we say "pants" we mean underpants. However, it's often used both as a generic term for any underwear and to refer to what you might refer to as briefs or bikinis, which we don't see as much distinction between as you do in the US. A European brief is smaller than a US one and more fitted, usually with a distinct pouch. What you would refer to as "tighty whities" we would probably call y-fronts or old-mans pants and absolutely nobody under about 70 wears them as a general rule! If we mean "boxers" we would tend to say boxers and the boxer-brief would be included in that. Boxer briefs have become the predominant style over here, with their sub-styles, trunks, A-front, etc. The super-baggy boxer is now also seen as the underwear of the slightly older man. Children would wear our style of briefs (just termed pants) until they were old enough to request something different. When they did request this, they would likely ask for a boxer-brief style, although some boys will continue wearing what they have always worn.

In the shops, even in supermarkets, there is usually a range of both uk-style briefs, various boxer styles and y-fronts. The names of things in shops and common usage seem to vary somewhat, but what you would call a bikini is often labelled as a slip. Some manufacturers use mini brief and micro brief to describe the side height. Although not the most popular choice nowadays, they are still fairly common and not really frowned upon or seen as that unusual for a man to wear. What you call a string bikini, Europeans call a Tanga. This is starting to approach more adventurous territory, depending on styling but basic versions are still sold in mainstream shops.

Once we get into thongs, these are not so common and all but a few high-street retailers don't stock thongs for men. The term thong and string are often used interchangeably in Europe. For example, in France they don't use the term thong, but string instead, which is why all of Hom's line are referred to as strings even if they technically aren't.

For swimwear, if we say swimming trunks in the UK, we often mean a speedo style, but also it's used as a generic term for any swimwear. We all grew up wearing the speedo style and young children still do regularly. Swimming shorts didn't start to become really popular until the 90s. Even then we started wearing speedos to the pool but shorts to the beach. Speedo style is now seen as a little unusual but still not frowned upon in most contexts. You're more likely to see them worn by older men or those swimming laps. You can wear them anywhere, even water parks and family pools. Not to allow this would be deemed as discrimination under UK and European laws as women are allowed to wear this style. For the same reason a biological male could wear female-biased swimwear and vice-versa.The boxer-brief style tight swimming shorts are also popular and a lot of people wear these. In many European countries, for example France, it's actually illegal to wear baggy shorts in the pool for hygiene reasons. Public pools insist on either boxer-brief style or smaller, or even speedo style only, depending on local regulations. In these countries, nobody wears baggy shorts at all.

For women the one-piece swimsuit is the predominant style, although bikinis have become much more popular, as they are in the rest of Europe. Until relatively recently, the bikini was not really seen much in public pools. It was never actually banned but women saved these for foreign beaches and stuck to one-piece swimming costumes for the pool and UK beaches. We also have seen an increasing number of women and girls wearing shorts and rash vests or swim tank tops here in the UK in public family pools.

Thong swimwear should be OK on the beach in the UK, although you don't see men wearing thongs really at all. It would not be considered illegal though. You do see women wearing thong/brazillian/cheeky style here, but it tends to be the younger generation. Many but not all public family pools here have banned thongs for both sexes but this is down to the management not law. At a gym or spa pool or during an "adult swim" session, thongs should usually be okay.

In many places in Europe, on nudist/naturist beaches clothes are banned by law and you are not allowed to be clothed on them so by extension a thong is banned as well! Also, in many places in Europe, swimwear is banned on the public streets and is restricted to the actual beach, so you can't wander into the town still dressed in swimwear, you must change first.

So there you go, I hope some of you found this interesting ;-)

Re: Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2020 6:15 pm
by tbdrawer
Great forum post that should enlighten many. There are a lot of differences in how underwear is labeled through the world. I see micro briefs being used often for what I consider a bikini. I thought I was told either in the UK or Europe that a bikini is only thought as a women's two piece and not used to describe the bottom cut as we do in the US. Also like you said tanga is often referred to as a string bikini, but other places a tanga is a thong.

Re: Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2020 1:10 am
by stringbikinidude
I stumbled upon a beach clip of a welsh beach from the 90s on vimeo. I have to say I am surprised to see such a european looking beach in Wales (aka lots of speedos) as I thought that the UK was equally prudish as north america, but maybe that is only a recent development? I think even the 80s/90s in Canada/U.S. you might have seen some similar scenes like this beach. But maybe this sums up the difference between North America and european beaches. I think the ratio for speedos on guys still seems higher compared to an american or canadian beach. I really wish 'retro' swimwear would come back!(sexy styles for men and women) Around the 28 min mark there is a cool looking euro hunk (fabio like) in a hot bikini with an equally hot lady friend by his side ; )

https://vimeo.com/221808246

Re: Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2020 9:57 am
by David_NC
Wow some bad 80s music and fashion. I’m glad some of that fashion has died. It was nice seeing so many guys comfortable wearing swim briefs and no one seemed to care or notice. You would definitely not see this on the beaches of North Carolina. Very conservative men, one time I saw an older man in a swim brief. Even women don’t typically wear thongs on the beach, but their full cuts become wedgies so they show a little tail. Now if you go south to Florida, Miami or south beach specifically you will see more men in skimpy bathing suits. Not sure about other beaches of US. One term that is somewhat confusing is Tanga. I think there was once a brand of underwear called Tanga. And I always associated Tanga with a string bikini with a smaller front and rear but I read that some areas refer to Tanga as a thong. Here in NC a “bikini” brief isn’t even as small many of the reviews that Nate has done. His would be considered micro bikini or something.

Re: Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2020 12:27 am
by stringbikinidude
Agreed that the 80s had some terrible fashion and music but I also liked alot of 80s fashion and music. Maybe i'm stuck in the 80s :D That seemed to be much more of an era for the speedo than today. So I'll even take all the terrible fashion and music along with it. Seems like it was a simpler and more enjoyable time than our current times to be honest.

Re: Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2021 11:49 am
by JustSomeDude71
I have recently heard someone refer to Y-front briefs as "Old dad underwear"

So, in the UK, the term "fanny" means "vagina" or the crotch-area? Here in the US "fanny" is a reference to one's butt. I heard this from an English girl I knew once.

Re: Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2021 3:16 am
by TANGA TANGA
JustSomeDude71 wrote: Fri Apr 02, 2021 11:49 am I have recently heard someone refer to Y-front briefs as "Old dad underwear"

So, in the UK, the term "fanny" means "vagina" or the crotch-area? Here in the US "fanny" is a reference to one's butt. i heard this from an English girls I knew once.
You are correct about the word "fanny" being another word for a lady's private parts in the UK. I remember watching an episode of the comedy M*A*S*H many years ago and being horrified when one of the doctors said to a nurse something about getting an injection in the fanny(lol). You also have fanny packs over in the US which we call bum bags. You are possibly too young to remember an all girl rock group from the 70's who were called Fanny, but I'm sure you can imagine the furore their name caused back in the day.
Another word that can cause confusion and stifled laughter is the term fag. It is a common name for a cigarette over here, but is a derogatory and offensive term elsewhere. I had a young American friend who came over to Scotland for the first time back in the nineties and he was shocked when a guy told him he was struggling to give up the fags(true story)lol.
Y-fronts, particularly white baggy ones are sometimes referred to as "dad underwear" although I believe the term "Tighty Whities" can also be used in a derogatory fashion. I guess we just have to be mindful when we are in foreign lands that the wrong use of a word can get us in to bother.

Re: Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:32 am
by Jordan
In France, for men, the word "slip" is used to designate a brief. It is an anglicism coming from the verb to slip ... There are different kinds of briefs, the oldest being the "slip kangourou" (= brief kangaroo) in cotton and pocket at the front.
Women's "culottes" (= panties) can be called "slips" but men's brief is never called "culotte"...
Yet originally "la culotte" were the "pantalon" (= pants) for men ...
And the old first women's panties were called "pantalons"...! It's a bit of a paradox!
:)
Small swimsuits are called "Slips de bain" (= swim briefs)
The word bikini is mainly used for women, small triangular briefs for men are called "mini-slip" or even "slip-bikini". When there are narrow strings on the hips, then we say "slip tanga" or "tanga". Men's tangas cover the buttocks well, women tanga barely reveal them half or much.
The thong, feminine or masculine, is called "string". In Spain all thongs and mini-brazilians are called tangas.

In the larger briefs there are the "caleçons", boxers, shorts, "shortys", etc. this varies according to the size and the shape and it is a little confusing ... There are "mini-shortys" which show the bottom of the buttocks ( female or male)...

It was my little French lesson in underwear! ;)

Re: Difference in undwear terminology and attitudes on both sides of the atlantic.

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 9:00 am
by JustSomeDude71
The only terminology that I don't particularly care for is when I'm browsing the Asian websites and the product terminology reads as following:

Describing the styles of men's underwear that we here prefer to wear as "Gay penis pouch, sissy, panties" Those are derogatory and insulting and casts aspersions on us men who like to wear close-fitting, supportive and minimalist-look underwear.

That would be the same as a vendor selling women's underwear and describing them as "panties for sluts, whores, strippers, prostitutes and tramps"

Of course, they would never do that because the backlash would hurt their sales and ruin their business. I wonder why they don't mind offending men the same way they are careful not to offend women?

And those here that are gay, you have more cause above anyone else to be offended! Because not all gay men wear bikinis, thongs and g-strings. It would be tantamount to making such broad, sweeping assumptions about certain racial/ethnic groups in regards to social habits, eating habits and behavior.