Re: Influences on choice as a youngster
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:42 pm
No, I don't even think I knew what an Australian was, much less a budgie smuggler.
But here's another influence, not a small one either. And not specifically about swimwear though you'll get the connection.
When I was a kid, once a year they used to have circus programs on TV. There wasn't all that much programming, and these were "special event" shows. I watched them with my grandparents. Some of those acts were really stripped-down back then. Both guys and girls wore costumes that were meant to show off their bodies. Guys wore bikini style briefs, girls too, or extremely high cut suits. They looked like they were all wearing swimwear, but only with sequins. But at the time, what they were wearing was much smaller and sexier than the swimsuits of the time, especially the girls. You could see more skin in a circus than on the beach. The effect of exposed strong bodies doing dangerous things imprinted on my young mind, and the two different scenarios, circus and swimwear, became somewhat merged. As time went on, the good ol' circus pushed the limits of exposure (as they have since their beginnings), and put their girls in thongs and g-strings, though most likely over flesh-colored tights, but you couldn't tell that on TV. Guys were in tights with huge visible bulges. Not like today where every square inch of flesh is covered completely, as if the sexy outfit would somehow detract from the act. It was actually the reverse. I don't know what happened, but acts were in thongs starting in the 1970s and through the 1980s, and covered head to toe by the end of the 1990s. Somebody probably complained that the outfits were not for a kids show. Point taken.
It was on those programs that I coupled the small bikini and thong, and their emphasis on bodies contours, with strength and daring, both for men and women, and where I saw my first thong in a performance. It was on a woman, and she did a trapeze act high in the air, finishing with a iron-jaw hang (from her teeth) and spin. It was a total knock-out.
What those visuals did for me was, I think, sort of unique. I wanted to experience the feeling of it was like wearing that kind of outfit, but also doing something risky. So, that's where the bikini/thong/jock play came from, though fortunately the risky act part never really got going. As time went on, real swimsuits got smaller and sexier, men and boys (definitely me included) were wearing speedos and smaller. Girls got ahead of us of course, and ended up wearing thongs more often than we did, but we got there too. Then the circus reversed itself, and you could then see more skin on the beach.
The contour of those bikinis and thongs projected a sort of tension to the act, and the sexual part was intentional and undeniable. I've read an account from a guy who was in those acts, and he related that at one point they were all in g-strings, and how incredibly exciting it was. Nice to know they liked it too! But the point was, they knew what they were doing and why. It was a way to get the men and boys running to the show over and over again. But women didn't escape the effect either, the buff man on the trapeze did in fact get them started up too.a So, the reversal in costume must have been the result of pressure, not because it didn't work anymore. For me, it still works every time.
That's where all my experimentation with bikinis and thongs started. I'm not gay, bi, trans, or a CD. I never took the woman's role in any of this. But that influence was pretty strong and has lasted a lifetime. I like the emphasis the bikini and thong put on the body shape, both sexes, the implied strength and self confidence, yes and quite a bit of showing off. It doesn't bother me all that much that thongs and bikinis are not main-stream for men, it just makes those of us who insist on wearing them unique and show-off-ish.
But here's another influence, not a small one either. And not specifically about swimwear though you'll get the connection.
When I was a kid, once a year they used to have circus programs on TV. There wasn't all that much programming, and these were "special event" shows. I watched them with my grandparents. Some of those acts were really stripped-down back then. Both guys and girls wore costumes that were meant to show off their bodies. Guys wore bikini style briefs, girls too, or extremely high cut suits. They looked like they were all wearing swimwear, but only with sequins. But at the time, what they were wearing was much smaller and sexier than the swimsuits of the time, especially the girls. You could see more skin in a circus than on the beach. The effect of exposed strong bodies doing dangerous things imprinted on my young mind, and the two different scenarios, circus and swimwear, became somewhat merged. As time went on, the good ol' circus pushed the limits of exposure (as they have since their beginnings), and put their girls in thongs and g-strings, though most likely over flesh-colored tights, but you couldn't tell that on TV. Guys were in tights with huge visible bulges. Not like today where every square inch of flesh is covered completely, as if the sexy outfit would somehow detract from the act. It was actually the reverse. I don't know what happened, but acts were in thongs starting in the 1970s and through the 1980s, and covered head to toe by the end of the 1990s. Somebody probably complained that the outfits were not for a kids show. Point taken.
It was on those programs that I coupled the small bikini and thong, and their emphasis on bodies contours, with strength and daring, both for men and women, and where I saw my first thong in a performance. It was on a woman, and she did a trapeze act high in the air, finishing with a iron-jaw hang (from her teeth) and spin. It was a total knock-out.
What those visuals did for me was, I think, sort of unique. I wanted to experience the feeling of it was like wearing that kind of outfit, but also doing something risky. So, that's where the bikini/thong/jock play came from, though fortunately the risky act part never really got going. As time went on, real swimsuits got smaller and sexier, men and boys (definitely me included) were wearing speedos and smaller. Girls got ahead of us of course, and ended up wearing thongs more often than we did, but we got there too. Then the circus reversed itself, and you could then see more skin on the beach.
The contour of those bikinis and thongs projected a sort of tension to the act, and the sexual part was intentional and undeniable. I've read an account from a guy who was in those acts, and he related that at one point they were all in g-strings, and how incredibly exciting it was. Nice to know they liked it too! But the point was, they knew what they were doing and why. It was a way to get the men and boys running to the show over and over again. But women didn't escape the effect either, the buff man on the trapeze did in fact get them started up too.a So, the reversal in costume must have been the result of pressure, not because it didn't work anymore. For me, it still works every time.
That's where all my experimentation with bikinis and thongs started. I'm not gay, bi, trans, or a CD. I never took the woman's role in any of this. But that influence was pretty strong and has lasted a lifetime. I like the emphasis the bikini and thong put on the body shape, both sexes, the implied strength and self confidence, yes and quite a bit of showing off. It doesn't bother me all that much that thongs and bikinis are not main-stream for men, it just makes those of us who insist on wearing them unique and show-off-ish.